| Back to About OPA

|
Reprinted from the 50th Anniversary
issue of The Ohio Psychologist,
September 1999, Volume 46, Number 1.
A Brief History of Psychology
and the OPA
Celebrating 50 Years of Psychological
Advancement in Ohio
By Garland Y. (Gary) DeNelsky, Ph.D.
Gary DeNelsky has worked with OPA
for many years serving as President and also on the Executive Committee of
the Board as elected representative to APA. He served on its Board of
Trustees for 25 consecutive years. In 2001 he retired from the
Cleveland Clinic, where he headed its Section of Psychology, and founded and
directed its Smoking Cessation Program. He currently chairs the Cuyahoga
County Tobacco Control Coalition and is actively working to help achieve
smoke-free indoor air in all public places in Ohio.
When the Ohio Psychological Association was established 50
years ago, psychology looked rather differently than it does today. Most
psychologists then were affiliated with academia, making their living
teaching, doing research, or fulfilling administrative duties. Applied
psychology was only a small fraction of the total psychology endeavor.
The Ohio Psychological Association, born during the
immediate post-war period, was in many respects a miniature American
Psychological Association. Its membership contained few clinicians, its dues
were quite low, its focus primarily on research and academic matters. Its
meetings -- hardly large enough to earn the name "conventions" -- were
primarily paper reading gatherings. The president of the Association was
typically a highly respected academician whose works were widely known
throughout psychology -- individuals such as George Kelley, Sidney Pressey,
and Calvin Hall. The leadership positions of the Association were more
honorary than active.
OPA continued more or less in this mode throughout that
period which later became known as the "Silent 50's." But during that time
psychology itself was going through a major metamorphosis. More and more
psychology students were being trained to do things outside the walls of the
college or university. The wartime need for practical applications of
psychology had resulted in a gradually increasing number of clinical
students throughout the 50's. For OPA, this meant an increasing number of
non-academicians were joining in the late 50's and early 60's.
As with so many aspects of American society, the 60's were
a time of extraordinary ferment and change. Psychology came to train many
more doctoral candidates in the clinical area than in the
research/experimental area. Other applied fields such as industrial and
organizational psychology were growing rapidly as well. Psychology became
the single most popular undergraduate major. During the 60's more and more
clinicians and other applied psychologists joined OPA. Since viable
organizations inevitably come to represent the concerns of the bulk of their
membership, the voices of the clinicians became louder and more influential
within the Association.
Clinicians and other applied psychologists had some very
different priorities from researchers and academicians. Successfully
managing professional issues, not exchanging research information, was of
immediate concern to the practitioner. At the national level, the American
Psychological Association (APA) remained remarkably unchanged during the
60's even though the composition of psychology was dramatically changing.
Frustrated by their inability to effect much change at the national level,
the ever-increasing numbers of newly trained clinicians turned to their
state associations as their vehicle of choice for change. In Ohio, that
meant joining OPA; as they joined OPA, OPA changed.
By the beginning of the 70's, OPA was almost completely in
the hands of the applied psychologists. As they witnessed the Association
changing, the academicians left in large numbers (and still have not
returned, despite repeated recruitment efforts). Meanwhile, the clinicians
were facing the inevitable frustrations of a new discipline attempting to
establish itself in an indifferent and sometimes hostile environment. Some
psychiatrists, for example, were arguing that psychologists should not be
permitted to call themselves "doctors" since they were not medically
trained! Psychologists were not licensed. In the early 70's, with David
Rodgers, Ph.D., as point guard, Ohio succeeded in securing licensing, the
opposition to which came from both within and outside of psychology. This
followed a legislative struggle that lasted more than 10 years. Then, in a
move unprecedented among state psychological associations, OPA hired its
first executive director, Henry Saeman. Actually beginning as a lobbyist, he
gradually expanded his role to become the first full-time executive director
of any state psychological association. With Saeman's efforts, OPA
established an effective ongoing presence in the legislature, and
psychology, represented by OPA, made many gains during the 70's including
inclusion in freedom of choice and other important legislation.
The 80's were a "golden age" for psychology. The field was
firmly established and growing at a phenomenal rate. Third party payers were
paying for psychological services with only a few exceptions. OPA's growth
during this decade was substantial -- from a few hundred members to well
over a thousand. Psychologists were making more money and groused only a
little at paying increasing dues. Increased revenues meant the Association
could provide more member services as well as become more heavily engaged in
legislative and other outside activities. Psychology became a real player in
the legislative arena. One of OPA's most significant achievements was its
leading role in the creation of the School of Professional Psychology at
Wright State University. Many psychologists were going into independent
practice, and these people voiced to OPA an ever-increasing need for
appropriate support activities. To help meet these needs, OPA offered more
workshops on business and investment issues, provided legal assistance to
its members, and experienced some ambivalence regarding how much assistance
it should provide for that small but influential group of entrepreneurs who
had learned how to develop the business side of psychological practice to
previously unimagined levels.
The 90's began as the 80's had ended -- psychology and OPA
were growing and prospering. But changes were on the horizon. Within OPA
governance, tensions arose within its expanding central office and its
governing board that led to several resignations and produced deep
divisions. Outside of OPA, rising health care costs coupled with the failure
of Congress to adopt any type of comprehensive health care legislation led
to the birth and growth of managed care corporations. Managed care focused
many of its early efforts toward mental health, and as a consequence, storm
clouds appeared quickly in the professional lives of practicing
psychologists. Other groups (such as persons with master's degrees in
psychology) increased their efforts to establish themselves as providers
legally equivalent to doctoral-trained psychologists. OPA did its best to
help psychologists cope with this new set of challenges, e.g., adding member
services that specialized in helping providers deal with arbitrary denial
(or reductions) of their claims for providing service. OPA also became the
primary administrator for mandatory continuing education -- perhaps the most
major legislation affecting psychology to emerge in the 90's.
During the 50 years of its existence, OPA has experienced
some remarkable changes. These changes have paralleled the monumental growth
and transformations that have occurred within psychology as a whole. For
much of its 50 years, OPA has served as a leader for other state
psychological associations, changing with the times and adapting to an
every-changing environment. It seems well positioned to help define and
support psychology in the twenty-first century much as it has done for the
last half of the twentieth.
Reprinted from the 50th Anniversary
issue of The Ohio Psychologist,
September 1999, Volume 46, Number 1.
|
|